Holding addresses
snapshot2,116
Across 3,332 circulating inscriptions
Snapshot captured · 26 Jul 2026, 05:17:33 UTC
The Wizards of Ord
3,333 inscriptions·Collection verified in curated registry
Indexed at Bitcoin block 959,656
View on ord.net ↗
Data served from Supabase
Single holders
snapshot82.28%
1,741 addresses hold one piece
Average holding
snapshot1.57
Median holding: 1
Largest holder
snapshot3.21%
107 inscriptions held
Single-holder supply
snapshot52.25%
1,741 inscriptions held by one-piece addresses
Circulating supply
snapshot3,332
1 unavailable, including 1 burned
Ownership · Advanced snapshot
Ownership intelligence
Distribution metrics designed to reveal how evenly the circulating supply is held across Bitcoin addresses.
Ownership evenness
snapshot20.8%
440 effective holders across 2,116 addresses
Effective holders
snapshot440
Concentration-adjusted holder count
Gini coefficient
snapshot0.335
0 means equal · 1 means highly concentrated
Top 1% supply
snapshot13.84%
22 largest addresses
Top 5% supply
snapshot28.48%
106 largest addresses
Top 10% supply
snapshot37.97%
212 largest addresses
Whale-tier supply
snapshot30.04%
119 addresses each hold at least 0.1% of supply
Multi-holder supply
snapshot47.75%
Supply held by addresses owning two or more pieces
Largest holder multiple
snapshot68.2×
Largest balance relative to average holding
How to read these metrics
Nine advanced ownership metrics calculated from the current address distribution.
Ownership evenness+
Effective holders divided by observed holding addresses. A value of 100% means that every holding address owns exactly the same number of inscriptions.
Effective holders+
The number of equally weighted holders that would produce the same concentration as the observed distribution. It is calculated as the inverse of the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index.
Gini coefficient+
Measures inequality across holding addresses. A value of 0 represents equal holdings, while a value approaching 1 represents extreme concentration.
Top 1% supply+
Share of circulating supply held by the largest 1% of observed holding addresses.
Top 5% supply+
Share of circulating supply held by the largest 5% of observed holding addresses.
Top 10% supply+
Share of circulating supply held by the largest 10% of observed holding addresses.
Whale-tier supply+
Combined share of supply held by addresses that each control at least 0.1% of the circulating collection.
Multi-holder supply+
Share of circulating supply held by addresses owning two or more inscriptions from the collection.
Largest holder multiple+
Largest address balance divided by the average holding. A value of 10× means that the largest address holds ten times the collection-wide average balance.
Top 1%, Top 5% and Top 10% are nested groups and should not be added together.
Bitcoin addresses are not the same as individual collectors. One person may control several addresses, while one address may represent a marketplace, custodian, shared wallet or organization.
Holder size versus supply
Address share compared with the share of inscriptions controlled
AddressesSupply
1pieces per address
2pieces per address
3-5pieces per address
6-10pieces per address
11-25pieces per address
26-50pieces per address
51+pieces per address
Lorenz curve
Cumulative holders versus cumulative supply
The curve compares the cumulative share of holding addresses with the cumulative share of supply. The further it sits below the equality line, the more concentrated ownership is.
Cumulative supplyCumulative addresses
Gini0.335
Effective holders440
Holding thresholds and whale tiers
Holder-balance percentiles and supply-based wallet categories
P90 is the minimum balance held by approximately the top 10% of addresses, P95 by the top 5%, and P99 by the top 1%.
P90 holding2Top 10% threshold
P95 holding4Top 5% threshold
P99 holding10Top 1% threshold
Fixed-address concentration
Supply held by the largest fixed number of addresses
Top 10 addresses
327 inscriptions9.81%
Top 25 addresses
491 inscriptions14.74%
Top 100 addresses
925 inscriptions27.76%
Whale tiers group addresses according to the percentage of circulating supply they control. They describe address size only and do not identify the person or organization behind an address.
TierAddressesInscriptionsSupply
mega≥ 1% of supply
21464.38%large0.5%–1% of supply
61494.47%whale0.1%–0.5% of supply
11170621.19%regular< 0.1% of supply
1,9972,33169.96%Evolution · Daily snapshots
Ownership history
Large figures show metric variations over the selected period. Smaller values show baseline → current.
Holding addresses-12,1172,116
Ownership evenness-0.2 pt21.0%20.8%
Effective holders-5445440
Gini coefficient+0.0010.3350.335
Largest holder+0.03 pt3.18%3.21%
Top 1% supply+0.06 pt13.78%13.84%
Single-holder supply+0.03 pt52.22%52.25%
Average holding-1.571.57
Holding addresses2,116
-124 Jul26 Jul
Effective holders440
-524 Jul26 Jul
Gini coefficient0.335
+0.00124 Jul26 Jul
Top 1% supply13.84%
+0.06 pt24 Jul26 Jul
Lines connect recorded daily observations only. Missing dates are not interpolated or estimated.
Ownership values come from an on-chain snapshot generated with a local ord index and published to Supabase. An address does not necessarily represent one individual owner. No investment conclusion should be drawn from these metrics.