Holding addresses
snapshot157
Across 500 circulating inscriptions
Snapshot captured · 26 Jul 2026, 05:09:46 UTC
STRUCTURES by Billy Restey
500 inscriptions·Collection verified in curated registry
Indexed at Bitcoin block 959,656
View on ord.net ↗
Data served from Supabase
Single holders
snapshot56.69%
89 addresses hold one piece
Average holding
snapshot3.18
Median holding: 1
Largest holder
snapshot8.4%
42 inscriptions held
Single-holder supply
snapshot17.8%
89 inscriptions held by one-piece addresses
Circulating supply
snapshot500
0 unavailable
Ownership · Advanced snapshot
Ownership intelligence
Distribution metrics designed to reveal how evenly the circulating supply is held across Bitcoin addresses.
Ownership evenness
snapshot26.2%
41 effective holders across 157 addresses
Effective holders
snapshot41
Concentration-adjusted holder count
Gini coefficient
snapshot0.548
0 means equal · 1 means highly concentrated
Top 1% supply
snapshot15.4%
2 largest addresses
Top 5% supply
snapshot33.6%
8 largest addresses
Top 10% supply
snapshot47.2%
16 largest addresses
Whale-tier supply
snapshot100.00%
157 addresses each hold at least 0.1% of supply
Multi-holder supply
snapshot82.20%
Supply held by addresses owning two or more pieces
Largest holder multiple
snapshot13.2×
Largest balance relative to average holding
How to read these metrics
Nine advanced ownership metrics calculated from the current address distribution.
Ownership evenness+
Effective holders divided by observed holding addresses. A value of 100% means that every holding address owns exactly the same number of inscriptions.
Effective holders+
The number of equally weighted holders that would produce the same concentration as the observed distribution. It is calculated as the inverse of the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index.
Gini coefficient+
Measures inequality across holding addresses. A value of 0 represents equal holdings, while a value approaching 1 represents extreme concentration.
Top 1% supply+
Share of circulating supply held by the largest 1% of observed holding addresses.
Top 5% supply+
Share of circulating supply held by the largest 5% of observed holding addresses.
Top 10% supply+
Share of circulating supply held by the largest 10% of observed holding addresses.
Whale-tier supply+
Combined share of supply held by addresses that each control at least 0.1% of the circulating collection.
Multi-holder supply+
Share of circulating supply held by addresses owning two or more inscriptions from the collection.
Largest holder multiple+
Largest address balance divided by the average holding. A value of 10× means that the largest address holds ten times the collection-wide average balance.
Top 1%, Top 5% and Top 10% are nested groups and should not be added together.
Bitcoin addresses are not the same as individual collectors. One person may control several addresses, while one address may represent a marketplace, custodian, shared wallet or organization.
Holder size versus supply
Address share compared with the share of inscriptions controlled
AddressesSupply
1pieces per address
2pieces per address
3-5pieces per address
6-10pieces per address
11-25pieces per address
26-50pieces per address
51+pieces per address
Lorenz curve
Cumulative holders versus cumulative supply
The curve compares the cumulative share of holding addresses with the cumulative share of supply. The further it sits below the equality line, the more concentrated ownership is.
Cumulative supplyCumulative addresses
Gini0.548
Effective holders41
Holding thresholds and whale tiers
Holder-balance percentiles and supply-based wallet categories
P90 is the minimum balance held by approximately the top 10% of addresses, P95 by the top 5%, and P99 by the top 1%.
P90 holding6Top 10% threshold
P95 holding10Top 5% threshold
P99 holding35Top 1% threshold
Fixed-address concentration
Supply held by the largest fixed number of addresses
Top 10 addresses
188 inscriptions37.6%
Top 25 addresses
284 inscriptions56.8%
Top 100 addresses
443 inscriptions88.6%
Whale tiers group addresses according to the percentage of circulating supply they control. They describe address size only and do not identify the person or organization behind an address.
TierAddressesInscriptionsSupply
mega≥ 1% of supply
2528456.8%large0.5%–1% of supply
279519%whale0.1%–0.5% of supply
10512124.2%regular< 0.1% of supply
000%Evolution · Daily snapshots
Ownership history
Large figures show metric variations over the selected period. Smaller values show baseline → current.
Holding addresses-157157
Ownership evenness-26.2%26.2%
Effective holders-4141
Gini coefficient-0.5480.548
Largest holder-8.40%8.40%
Top 1% supply-15.40%15.40%
Single-holder supply-17.80%17.80%
Average holding-3.183.18
Holding addresses157
-25 Jul26 Jul
Effective holders41
-25 Jul26 Jul
Gini coefficient0.548
-25 Jul26 Jul
Top 1% supply15.40%
-25 Jul26 Jul
Lines connect recorded daily observations only. Missing dates are not interpolated or estimated.
Ownership values come from an on-chain snapshot generated with a local ord index and published to Supabase. An address does not necessarily represent one individual owner. No investment conclusion should be drawn from these metrics.